Loading
Chatwoot vs Zammad
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Chatwoot | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 37,384 | 5,971 |
| License | Custom | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Primary language | Ruby | Ruby |
| Last commit | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-30 |
| Difficulty | Moderate | Moderate |
| Forks | 9.1k | 1.1k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Intercom | Intercom |
Best for Chatwoot
Support teams that want live chat and a shared inbox on infrastructure they control.
Best for Zammad
Support organizations that need tickets, roles, and more than one channel.