Loading
Uptime Kuma vs Vaultwarden
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences. This pair is shown for browsing but is not indexed (no shared category or overlapping use case).
| Attribute | Uptime Kuma | Vaultwarden |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 91,999 | 68,363 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last commit | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-25 |
| Difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Forks | 8.5k | 3.3k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Datadog | Bitwarden |
Best for Uptime Kuma
For operators who want a self-hosted uptime dashboard, notifications, and status pages.
Best for Vaultwarden
For experienced operators who want a Bitwarden-compatible server they control.