Loading
Pyroscope vs Uptime Kuma
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Pyroscope | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 11,690 | 91,999 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Go | JavaScript |
| Last commit | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-01 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Easy |
| Forks | 816 | 8.5k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Datadog |
Best for Pyroscope
Pyroscope records continuous application profiles to investigate performance bottlenecks.
Best for Uptime Kuma
For operators who want a self-hosted uptime dashboard, notifications, and status pages.