Loading
PocketBase vs Supabase
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | PocketBase | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 61,223 | 110,955 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | Yes |
| Primary language | Go | TypeScript |
| Last commit | 2026-09-28 | 2026-10-01 |
| Difficulty | Easy | Advanced |
| Forks | 3.7k | 15k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Firebase | Firebase |
Best for PocketBase
Small applications that need a backend without a cluster.
Best for Supabase
App teams that want Postgres plus auth without assembling each piece.