Loading
Keycloak vs ZITADEL
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Keycloak | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 37,078 | 15,185 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Java | Go |
| Last commit | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-02 |
| Difficulty | Advanced | Not assessed |
| Forks | 9.0k | 1.3k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Auth0 | Not recorded |
Best for Keycloak
Platform teams putting one login in front of several applications.
Best for ZITADEL
ZITADEL provides identity management, SSO, passkeys, and multitenant login.