Loading
Kestra vs open-flow
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Kestra | open-flow |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 29,069 | 199 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Java | TypeScript |
| Last commit | 2026-10-03 | 2026-10-04 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Not assessed |
| Forks | 3.2k | 23 |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Best for Kestra
Kestra orchestrates scheduled and event-driven workflows and records their executions.
Best for open-flow
Build workflows you can see, code, run, and own. Open-source visual workflow automation with real TypeScript, isolated execution, and a self-hosted Control API.