Loading
Huginn vs open-flow
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Huginn | open-flow |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 50,021 | 199 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | — | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Last commit | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-04 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Not assessed |
| Forks | 4.3k | 23 |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Best for Huginn
A self-hosted automation system whose agents watch sources and trigger actions.
Best for open-flow
Build workflows you can see, code, run, and own. Open-source visual workflow automation with real TypeScript, isolated execution, and a self-hosted Control API.