Loading
Grafana vs Pulse
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Grafana | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 77,059 | 6,779 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | — | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | TypeScript | Go |
| Last commit | 2026-10-04 | 2026-10-04 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Not assessed |
| Forks | 15k | 272 |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Best for Grafana
An observability dashboard for exploring metrics, logs, and traces from data sources.
Best for Pulse
Real-time monitoring dashboard for Proxmox VE, PBS, Docker, Kubernetes, TrueNAS and vSphere. Self-hosted, with smart alerts and AI patrols that catch silent failures.