Loading
Copyparty vs zrok
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Copyparty | zrok |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 46,893 | 4,761 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | — |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Python | Go |
| Last commit | 2026-10-03 | 2026-10-03 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Not assessed |
| Forks | 1.9k | 226 |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Best for Copyparty
Copyparty is a portable file server with resumable uploads, WebDAV, and media browsing.
Best for zrok
zrok shares private services and files through self-hostable public and private endpoints.