Loading
Bruno vs Gitea
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Bruno | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 47,298 | 58,247 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | — | — |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | JavaScript | Go |
| Last commit | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-01 |
| Difficulty | Easy | Moderate |
| Forks | 2.9k | 7.2k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Postman | Github |
Best for Bruno
API teams that want requests stored in the same repo as the service.
Best for Gitea
For teams that want Git hosting and development workflows on infrastructure they manage.