Loading
Authentik vs Kanidm
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | Authentik | Kanidm |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 25,795 | 5,434 |
| License | Custom | MPL-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | — |
| Cloud / hosted | — | — |
| Primary language | Python | Rust |
| Last commit | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-02 |
| Difficulty | Moderate | Not assessed |
| Forks | 2.1k | 366 |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Auth0 | Not recorded |
Best for Authentik
Teams that want SSO and are willing to run Docker or Kubernetes.
Best for Kanidm
An identity management server with user accounts, groups, and authentication policies.