Loading
goaccess vs PostHog
Side-by-side facts from the catalog. No overall winner - pick from license, hosting, and activity differences.
| Attribute | goaccess | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 20,995 | 40,049 |
| License | MIT | Custom |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Docker noted | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud / hosted | — | Yes |
| Primary language | C | Python |
| Last commit | 2026-10-04 | 2026-10-01 |
| Difficulty | Not assessed | Advanced |
| Forks | 1.2k | 3.5k |
| Star growth | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Pricing | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Integrations | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Alternative to | Not recorded | Google Analytics |
Best for goaccess
For operators who want traffic reporting from logs they already collect.
Best for PostHog
Product teams that want events, replay, and flags in the same tool.